Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
