Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
