Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Aero C5000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X