Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
