Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X and Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
