Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
