Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
