Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX stands out for a weight of 215g / 7,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX