Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Delphin REDIX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Aero 4000X
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin REDIX