Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
