Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (380kg / 837,76lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
