Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
