Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.11 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
