Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
