Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
