Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the total score (8.73 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
