Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Airity LT, 2500-D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10115-250
Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €261.70
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD, 4012QD, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Reel, Front Drag, 10516-412
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €249.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012QD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX offers a weight of 185g / 6,53oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33858 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Airity LT and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables