Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
90.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
