Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
57.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
