Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
