Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
