Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
