Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
73.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
