Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
