Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.49 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
