Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €204.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Vanford FA

Spinning

89.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight180g / 6.35oz

Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €184.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX and Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.