Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT
Spinning
71.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Legalis LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
