Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Luvias LT and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
