Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Luvias LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
