Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a durability of 7 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Catana FE?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
