Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
