Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.9:1) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
