Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
