Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
