Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD

Feeder And Match

91.10 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs

Weight380g / 13404oz

Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €249.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4012QD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33858 inch) and total score (9.11 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.