Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
