Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6878oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26772 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
