Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

57.00 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Battle III

Spinning

67.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.81 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.6:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight590g / 20.81oz

Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €113.30
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Conclusion

Penn Battle III 6000X edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch) and the gear ratio (5.6:1). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a ergonomics of 6.32 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Battle III?

Penn Battle III 6000X

A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly