Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX and Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX offers a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch, while Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano 19 Stella?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
