Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 215g / 7,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
