Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 4010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-405
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €299.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4010
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT, 2000S-H, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10001-201
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
92.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €469.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000S-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX stands out for a weight of 145g / 5,11oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables