Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.47 out of 10). Still, Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 215g / 7,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
