Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Mitchell 300 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Mitchell 300 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Mitchell 300?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Mitchell 300 4000X
- With a score like 8.21 out of 10 (268g / 9,45oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
