Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
