Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
