Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
71.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 3012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa TD Match 3012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD Match and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TD Match 3012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa BG 5000X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD