Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
