Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
