Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX edges out Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X
