Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
